Find stuff quickly
Saturday, April 23, 2011
Wednesday, April 20, 2011
Week Fourteen
Thesis:
Homelessness is a significant problem in major cities across the country, and despite our best efforts, remains an issue.
Old paragraph:
Unfortunately, despite all their good intentions, programs from different departments and even within the same wings of the same departments sometimes overlap one another, and waste money and effort on providing duplicate services for some and no service for others. Some of these problems are cause by issues as silly as being unable to agree on the definition of 'homeless,' and what services those that are homeless or varying degrees of homeless qualify for. This has not only affects what services can be offered, but also what data can be collected in surveys. For example, if multiple departments sponsor multiple surveys and statistical reports that investigate identical or similar material, then there is no winning situation. If they agree with each other completely, then there was a huge waste of money. If they disagree on every point, then the survey or investigation must be redone by an independent third party, so as to not skew the results, which in the end wastes more money and time. If they agree on some things and disagree on others, then both scenarios come true, and money is still wasted, instead of being spent helping the homeless. This is why the Government Accountability Office is recommending a joint committee between HHS, HUD, and the Department of Education, which would be responsible for coordinating the three and making sure all resources are wisely distributed.
New paragraph:
Unfortunately, despite all their good intentions, programs from different departments sometimes overlap one another, wasting money and effort on providing duplicate services for some and no service for others. Some of these problems are caused by issues as silly as being unable to agree on the definition of ‘homeless,’ and what services those that are homeless qualify for. This has not only affected what services can be offered, but also what data can be collected in surveys. For example, if multiple departments sponsor multiple surveys that investigate identical or similar data trends, then there is no winning situation. If they agree with each other completely, then there was a huge waste of money. If they disagree on every point, then the survey or investigation must be redone by an independent third party, so as to not skew the results, which in the end wastes more money and time. If they agree on some things and disagree on others, then both scenarios come true, and money is still wasted, instead of being spent helping the homeless. That is why the Government Accountability Office is recommending a joint committee between HHS, HUD, and the Department of Education, which would be responsible for coordinating the three and making sure all resources are wisely distributed (Cackley).
Homelessness is a significant problem in major cities across the country, and despite our best efforts, remains an issue.
Old paragraph:
Unfortunately, despite all their good intentions, programs from different departments and even within the same wings of the same departments sometimes overlap one another, and waste money and effort on providing duplicate services for some and no service for others. Some of these problems are cause by issues as silly as being unable to agree on the definition of 'homeless,' and what services those that are homeless or varying degrees of homeless qualify for. This has not only affects what services can be offered, but also what data can be collected in surveys. For example, if multiple departments sponsor multiple surveys and statistical reports that investigate identical or similar material, then there is no winning situation. If they agree with each other completely, then there was a huge waste of money. If they disagree on every point, then the survey or investigation must be redone by an independent third party, so as to not skew the results, which in the end wastes more money and time. If they agree on some things and disagree on others, then both scenarios come true, and money is still wasted, instead of being spent helping the homeless. This is why the Government Accountability Office is recommending a joint committee between HHS, HUD, and the Department of Education, which would be responsible for coordinating the three and making sure all resources are wisely distributed.
New paragraph:
Unfortunately, despite all their good intentions, programs from different departments sometimes overlap one another, wasting money and effort on providing duplicate services for some and no service for others. Some of these problems are caused by issues as silly as being unable to agree on the definition of ‘homeless,’ and what services those that are homeless qualify for. This has not only affected what services can be offered, but also what data can be collected in surveys. For example, if multiple departments sponsor multiple surveys that investigate identical or similar data trends, then there is no winning situation. If they agree with each other completely, then there was a huge waste of money. If they disagree on every point, then the survey or investigation must be redone by an independent third party, so as to not skew the results, which in the end wastes more money and time. If they agree on some things and disagree on others, then both scenarios come true, and money is still wasted, instead of being spent helping the homeless. That is why the Government Accountability Office is recommending a joint committee between HHS, HUD, and the Department of Education, which would be responsible for coordinating the three and making sure all resources are wisely distributed (Cackley).
Week Fourteen
Thesis:
Homelessness is a significant problem in major cities across the country, and despite our best efforts, remains an issue.
Old paragraph:
Unfortunately, despite all their good intentions, programs from different departments and even within the same wings of the same departments sometimes overlap one another, and waste money and effort on providing duplicate services for some and no service for others. Some of these problems are cause by issues as silly as being unable to agree on the definition of 'homeless,' and what services those that are homeless or varying degrees of homeless qualify for. This has not only affects what services can be offered, but also what data can be collected in surveys. For example, if multiple departments sponsor multiple surveys and statistical reports that investigate identical or similar material, then there is no winning situation. If they agree with each other completely, then there was a huge waste of money. If they disagree on every point, then the survey or investigation must be redone by an independent third party, so as to not skew the results, which in the end wastes more money and time. If they agree on some things and disagree on others, then both scenarios come true, and money is still wasted, instead of being spent helping the homeless. This is why the Government Accountability Office is recommending a joint committee between HHS, HUD, and the Department of Education, which would be responsible for coordinating the three and making sure all resources are wisely distributed.
New paragraph:
Unfortunately, despite all their good intentions, programs from different departments sometimes overlap one another, wasting money and effort on providing duplicate services for some and no service for others. Some of these problems are caused by issues as silly as being unable to agree on the definition of ‘homeless,’ and what services those that are homeless qualify for. This has not only affected what services can be offered, but also what data can be collected in surveys. For example, if multiple departments sponsor multiple surveys that investigate identical or similar data trends, then there is no winning situation. If they agree with each other completely, then there was a huge waste of money. If they disagree on every point, then the survey or investigation must be redone by an independent third party, so as to not skew the results, which in the end wastes more money and time. If they agree on some things and disagree on others, then both scenarios come true, and money is still wasted, instead of being spent helping the homeless. That is why the Government Accountability Office is recommending a joint committee between HHS, HUD, and the Department of Education, which would be responsible for coordinating the three and making sure all resources are wisely distributed (Cackley).
Homelessness is a significant problem in major cities across the country, and despite our best efforts, remains an issue.
Old paragraph:
Unfortunately, despite all their good intentions, programs from different departments and even within the same wings of the same departments sometimes overlap one another, and waste money and effort on providing duplicate services for some and no service for others. Some of these problems are cause by issues as silly as being unable to agree on the definition of 'homeless,' and what services those that are homeless or varying degrees of homeless qualify for. This has not only affects what services can be offered, but also what data can be collected in surveys. For example, if multiple departments sponsor multiple surveys and statistical reports that investigate identical or similar material, then there is no winning situation. If they agree with each other completely, then there was a huge waste of money. If they disagree on every point, then the survey or investigation must be redone by an independent third party, so as to not skew the results, which in the end wastes more money and time. If they agree on some things and disagree on others, then both scenarios come true, and money is still wasted, instead of being spent helping the homeless. This is why the Government Accountability Office is recommending a joint committee between HHS, HUD, and the Department of Education, which would be responsible for coordinating the three and making sure all resources are wisely distributed.
New paragraph:
Unfortunately, despite all their good intentions, programs from different departments sometimes overlap one another, wasting money and effort on providing duplicate services for some and no service for others. Some of these problems are caused by issues as silly as being unable to agree on the definition of ‘homeless,’ and what services those that are homeless qualify for. This has not only affected what services can be offered, but also what data can be collected in surveys. For example, if multiple departments sponsor multiple surveys that investigate identical or similar data trends, then there is no winning situation. If they agree with each other completely, then there was a huge waste of money. If they disagree on every point, then the survey or investigation must be redone by an independent third party, so as to not skew the results, which in the end wastes more money and time. If they agree on some things and disagree on others, then both scenarios come true, and money is still wasted, instead of being spent helping the homeless. That is why the Government Accountability Office is recommending a joint committee between HHS, HUD, and the Department of Education, which would be responsible for coordinating the three and making sure all resources are wisely distributed (Cackley).
Wednesday, April 6, 2011
Week Twelve
Original:
The idea practice of monogamy has been widely accepted for much of history. Religious figures have always praised it, and cursed those that reject it. Politically, fathers would marry off their daughters for an increase in social status or power. To get the most value out of their daughters, they would ensure that they were still virgins when married, and it was understood that they would only marry once. In fact, the idea of love didn't become widespread until the Industrial Revolution in the nineteenth century. That is less than 200 years ago that people actually started to marry for reasons other than money and status. At the time, this was a huge deal for the fathers, who didn't want their daughters to marry some poor farm boy, but rather someone with money to make them richer. But as with all major shifts in thinking, people come to accept the change over time, and now we have certain days set aside in the year to spend with the poor farm boy your dad told you now to hang around.
Revised:
The idea practice of monogamy has been widely accepted for much of history. Religious figures have always praised it, and cursed those that reject it. Politically, fathers would marry off their daughters for an increase in social status or power. To get the most value out of their daughters, they would ensure that they were still virgins when married, and it was understood that they would only marry once. In fact, the idea of love didn't become widespread until the Industrial Revolution in the nineteenth century. That is less than 200 years ago that people actually started to marry for reasons other than money and status. At the time, this was a huge deal for the fathers, who didn't want their daughters to marry some poor farm boy, but rather someone with money to make them richer. But as with all major shifts in thinking, people come to accept the change over time, and now we have certain days set aside in the year to spend with the poor farm boy your dad told you now to hang around.
Revised:
The
practice of monogamy has been widely accepted for much of history. Religious
figures have always praised it, and cursed those that reject it (patriarchywebsite.com). Historically, daughters
were viewed as a valuable business commodity. Seeing as how daughters were less
useful as physical laborers than sons were, and couldn’t carry on the family
name, fathers would marry off their daughters for an increase in social status
or power. To get the highest value from their daughters, they would ensure that
they were still virgins when married, and they would only marry once. In fact,
the idea of love didn’t become widespread until the Industrial Revolution. Less
than 200 years ago that people actually started to marry for reasons other than
money and status (hirr.hartsem.edu). At the time, this of the upmost importance
for fathers, who didn’t want their daughters to marry some poor farm boy, but rather
someone with money to make them richer. But as with all major shifts in
thinking, people came to accept the change over time, and now we have certain
days set aside in the year to spend with your significant other.
Speaking of Valentine’s Day, you might be surprised as to
how unromantic the roots of this holiday truly are. From as early as 600 BC,
Romans practiced a festival in which men drew the names of teenage girls from a
box. Whoevers name they drew would be their sexual partner for the following
year, until the next festival (wilstar.com). All that has changed is now
instead of pulling a name out of a box, we buy a card and some flowers, or go
out to a nice dinner before enjoying copious amounts of sex.
Sunday, March 27, 2011
Week Ten
I would highly recommend 'A Modest Proposal' by Jonathon Swift to anyone looking for a good read. Regardless of whether it is required for a class or not, it is an entertaining piece of literature all on its own. Part of what makes it such an entertaining read is how successful it is. This success is drawn from an excellent understanding of a few key points in every proposal.
The first key point to include in any proposal is to identify the problem you are proposing a solution for. Swift very clearly identifies the problem: starvation in Ireland and the overbearing English. This problem is very near and dear to his audience, so there is not much he has to do to get the readers attention.
The second thing Swift does is to state his solution. Now he doesn't just come out and say it simply, but leads you into it with small steps, each one only a little less likable than the last. This allows you to keeping reading long after a more upfront approach would have failed. This helps to connect to the third most important thing, which is show why your proposal is better than any other. Swift shows that the sale and subsequent consumption of babies would benefit all involved, save the babies themselves. The decrease in population, the increase in the income of the poor, the increase in the food and clothing available for the rich, are all good arguments he uses to support his proposal.
The fourth important thing in any proposal is to be able to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposal. Swift uses something that would seem like science to determine the exact age and size for a child to be properly harvested. His exact specifications and manipulation of language provide ample reason why this is feasible.
The first key point to include in any proposal is to identify the problem you are proposing a solution for. Swift very clearly identifies the problem: starvation in Ireland and the overbearing English. This problem is very near and dear to his audience, so there is not much he has to do to get the readers attention.
The second thing Swift does is to state his solution. Now he doesn't just come out and say it simply, but leads you into it with small steps, each one only a little less likable than the last. This allows you to keeping reading long after a more upfront approach would have failed. This helps to connect to the third most important thing, which is show why your proposal is better than any other. Swift shows that the sale and subsequent consumption of babies would benefit all involved, save the babies themselves. The decrease in population, the increase in the income of the poor, the increase in the food and clothing available for the rich, are all good arguments he uses to support his proposal.
The fourth important thing in any proposal is to be able to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposal. Swift uses something that would seem like science to determine the exact age and size for a child to be properly harvested. His exact specifications and manipulation of language provide ample reason why this is feasible.
10 Questions
I will be investigating alternatives to monogamy in the traditional sense. I will be focusing on the following questions:
1. What are the traditional expectations of a couple, especially in marriage, and how have they been failing recently? How widespread of a problem is this?
2. What are the benefits to a healthy relationship? What are the consequences of an unhealthy one?
3. What are the current solutions to a failing relationship?
4. How are expectations in relationships changing?
5. What are the alternatives to monogamy? How feasible are these alternatives?
6. What is the best alternative? Why?
7. How does one implement said alternative?
8. What's the difference between fear of commitment and a rejection of monogamy?
9. What are the effects of a change? What are the effects of no change?
1. What are the traditional expectations of a couple, especially in marriage, and how have they been failing recently? How widespread of a problem is this?
2. What are the benefits to a healthy relationship? What are the consequences of an unhealthy one?
3. What are the current solutions to a failing relationship?
4. How are expectations in relationships changing?
5. What are the alternatives to monogamy? How feasible are these alternatives?
6. What is the best alternative? Why?
7. How does one implement said alternative?
8. What's the difference between fear of commitment and a rejection of monogamy?
9. What are the effects of a change? What are the effects of no change?
Monday, March 21, 2011
Week Nine and Three Quarters
Nuclear Power
The world is quickly falling into an energy crisis. Coal and oil sources are drying up at an alarming rate, and finding new veins is becoming increasingly more expensive and difficult. One power source that continues to advance it's technology and increase efficiency is nuclear energy. I am in full support of construction of additional nuclear power plants. Unfortunately, with the current Japanese nuclear crisis, nuclear energies negative stigmatism will undoubtedly increase.
Monogamy? No thank you!
One of the most commonly accepted practices in modern society is monogamy. This is truly terrible. Why should honest, hormone-driven people be forced to have sex with just one person at a time? I can understand living with just one person for the purpose of raising children, but if you want to go out and have an enjoyable evening with someone, why not?
Infrastructure
The current state of the United States infrastructure is a sad one indeed. Interstate highways, electrical lines, and urban plumbing are all at least 60 years old, and one of the least-funded budget items. I believe more of the budget should be directed towards maintaining our own country.
The world is quickly falling into an energy crisis. Coal and oil sources are drying up at an alarming rate, and finding new veins is becoming increasingly more expensive and difficult. One power source that continues to advance it's technology and increase efficiency is nuclear energy. I am in full support of construction of additional nuclear power plants. Unfortunately, with the current Japanese nuclear crisis, nuclear energies negative stigmatism will undoubtedly increase.
Monogamy? No thank you!
One of the most commonly accepted practices in modern society is monogamy. This is truly terrible. Why should honest, hormone-driven people be forced to have sex with just one person at a time? I can understand living with just one person for the purpose of raising children, but if you want to go out and have an enjoyable evening with someone, why not?
Infrastructure
The current state of the United States infrastructure is a sad one indeed. Interstate highways, electrical lines, and urban plumbing are all at least 60 years old, and one of the least-funded budget items. I believe more of the budget should be directed towards maintaining our own country.
Wednesday, March 2, 2011
State Patty's Day
Being
from Ann Arbor, I had never heard of State Patty’s Day before coming to Penn
State. For the first month of class, every time I saw a shirt, I assumed it was
a miss-print for St. Patty’s Day. Eventually I pieced together a mental image
of State Patty’s Day, formed from many a story of upperclassmen I’ve gotten to
know. From mounted police to armored cars, the stories made it sound like State
College was displaced to a third world militaristic state for the weekend. However,
I was excited to form my own stories of State Patty’s to tell to clueless
freshmen next year.
I didn’t have any friends visiting for the holiday, so I
decided to just take an easy weekend. My Friday night I worked on homework until
about 8:30, showered, and then headed over to my friends dorm for some grand
theft auto in his room. After wasting an hour on that, we decided to visit a
friend of his in State College Park. We had to catch the N bus at College and
Allen, so we decided to walk down College Ave for shits and giggles. We
witnessed large groups of people dressed in green garb, pounding on windows and
doors of closed businesses for no apparent reason. I mean, who wouldn’t want to
break into a clothes store at 10 pm on a Friday night? Once on the bus, we
stopped just before the IST building on Atherton Ave to drop some riders off. At
this stop, a large group of people made to board the bus. However, they were
stopped by the bus driver, who instructed them they had to pay for their ride.
Then one of them asked, to no one in particular, “Does this bus take us to frat
row? Does this bus go to frat row? Can I take this bus to frat row?” His only
reply was shouts of, “Get off the bus!”
Arriving at State College Park, we disembarked and walked
across an icy parking lot towards the building. We passed a drunk who had
fallen on the ice, and refused his girlfriend’s protests to get up and start
acting normal. Once at my friend’s friend’s apartment, we just chilled out and
watched a western hockey league game. The apartment had a party that started at
6:00 pm that day, but by the time we got there (10:30 pm) it had mostly died
down, and everyone had left. The host was drunk as a skunk, and trying to
debate whether to open his bottle of champagne. After about two hours, he
settled on opening it, on the constituency that we finished it that night. He
also made it his goal to drink enough to wake up drunk the next morning, and as
a result, he drank almost all the champagne. We left the apartment at 1:00 in
the morning, and I went to bed after that.
Saturday morning I woke up, showered, ate, and went
downtown around 10:30 am to purchase a bike I found on craigslist. On the short
walk down Garner across College, I passed someone who was struggling to stand
on their own. They resorted to leaning up against McLanahan’s, and occasionally
flopping an arm around. This was at 10:30 in the morning. I then vowed to walk
around downtown in approximately twelve hours, just to see what all the fuss
was about.
During the day, I visited a friend in University Gateway.
This was at about 2:00 pm. As I got off the elevator on the fifth floor, I was
greeted by a puddle of partially dried vomit that led across the floor and up a
wall to an open window. I guess whoever it came from just couldn’t hold it.
Stepping around the orange sticky liquid, I made my way into my friends room on
the east side of the building. This is the side that faces the Meridian
apartment complex. On this side of the building, just about every other window
had people leaning out of it, shouting to people around them, people in the
opposite building, people walking by, or just shouting in general. Numerous items
were thrown from windows, including full beer cans, water bottles, and red plastic
cups. At one point, a girl in a room on the top floor of the Meridian stood up
on her windowsill, bent over forward, and leaned the top half of her body out
of the window. She stayed in this position for nearly twenty minutes, all the
while people were yelling at her not to jump. I wasn’t afraid of suicide, but
seeing how intoxicated she was, I could see her tripping and accidentally
falling through the open window. Again, this was at 2:00 in the afternoon.
I ended up eating out that night, and then seeing Harry
Potter 7 in the HUB. After that, I went back to my room and freshened up. Then I
made my way back downtown, and tried to keep an open mind about what I would
see. At first, it seemed like the whole student population of the university
had left their residences and where walking the streets. However, this couldn’t
be true, because almost every balcony lining Beaver Ave was crowded with even
more people. The town was packed with more people than it could support. I had
an easier time walking the streets of New York City, the largest city in the
country, than walking down Beaver Ave on Saturday night. Personally, I didn’t
see anyone I knew, but several people acted quite friendly to me. The most
memorable occurred when a girl tripped into me while we were going opposite
ways. She was very apologetic, and tried to prove she was sorry by giving me an
awkwardly long and tight hug. After we pulled apart, she put her hand around my
neck, looked me dead in the eyes, and managed to slur out, “I’m so sorry, it’s
going to be ok. You know that, right? Everything’s going to be ok. You don’t
have to worry, it’s going to be ok.” I assured her that I was fine, and
continued on my way back to my room. I had seen enough.
Week Eight

Bagel
– The derivation of the shape is simple enough. Take two concentric circles,
make the distance between them the diameter of a perpendicular circle, and
rotate the perpendicular circle around the center point of the center of the
concentric circles. This design eliminates the center of the bread, allowing
for a more even bake. The hole also allows for more interesting displays, as
bakers may string them on dowel rods and hang them in their shops. The design also
accommodates for individual consumption quite well. The thumb and middle finger
come together in the hole to form interlocking rings with the bagel. Then the
bagel can be brought up to the mouth and back down to the side with ease. The
thickness of bagels allows a horizontal cut through them, on which a multitude
of spreads can be applied. Or the two pieces of bagel can be used to create a
sandwich.
Muffin
– This is another baked breakfast item, but that’s about were the similarities
end. The muffin is basically a overflowing inverted cone without the bottom
half. The muffin bottom is baked in a molded form, and the top is a natural
form, created from the rising yeast. During this rising, the bread escapes the
confines of the form and spills out over the top, creating a shape called a ‘muffin
top’. The form is usually lined with a paper wrapping to prevent the muffin
from burning. This paper holds the muffin together when removed from the mold,
but isn’t edible. But when the paper is removed, inescapably some of the muffin
comes off with it, and the form begins to fall apart. The disintegration of the
form requires the muffin to be consumed while being unwrapped, requiring two
hands and a good deal of concentration to simply consume it. Thus the form of a
muffin is not the most practical for travel or a multi-task meal.
Tuesday, February 22, 2011
Week Seven
For
my review I chose my shoes, the Nike Free Everyday 2+. I purchased these shoes
in August of 2009, and as such they are no longer available for purchase.
However, I felt a review of them was in order, as I can now comfortable and assuredly
give a well-informed and knowledgeable review of them. I am evaluating this
product as my personal response to the media buzz and social popularity and
impact they had upon the running world.
When
the first pair of Nike Frees came out, there was more talk about them than
actual sales. Though not an original idea, Nike was the first major running
shoe company to produce a “barefoot” running shoe. The concept comes from
scientific studies which show that advancements in shoe technology has allowed
our form as a species to degrade to a point where we are hurting ourselves more
than helping. Runners are landing primarily on the heel, and then pushing off
hard with the toes. This adds extra stress to the knees in the shock of body weight
being slammed down onto cement or concrete. Barefoot running draws its roots
from the primitive form of running, which is the natural way our bodies have
been designed to run, landing upon the ball of the foot and barely pushing off.
It is a much lighter and more efficient way to run, employing even the use of
gravity by the lean forward, shifting the center of balance forward of the
feet. The Nike Free helps promote this action by strengthening the arch of the
foot and being incredibly flexible.
Due to the large amount of press and
hype the Nike Free produced, Nike went on to redesign the shoe again and again,
creating the Free2, Free v. 3.0, Free v. 4.0, Free 5.0, Free 6.0, and Free 7.0.
They also produced a Free Everyday and a Free Everyday 2+, which are designed
for strengthening the arch while walking, without sacrificing any of the flexibility
of the original Free.
I purchased a pair of Everyday 2+
mainly because most of my friends had them, and had nothing but good things to
say about them. I was also in sore need of a new pair of shoes, as my old ones
had worn out faster than expected. I chose the Everyday 2+ over the Free 5.0
because I have a tendency to over pronate when I run, which means I run
slightly on the outside sides of my feet, rather than flat on the bottom. This
condition requires minor weights in my running shoes, which doesn’t fix the
problem, but creates a desire for my feet to run correctly. The weight is added
through the use of a denser foam on the inside of my running shoes, which the
Free 5.0 did not offer. So I went with the Everyday 2+.
Initially, I was quite satisfied
with my purchase. Nike’s website was well organized, with many different fields
for easy quick navigation, and a multitude of search refining options. The
delivery occurred within a week, and I was eager to try them out as an everyday
shoe. The first week of wearing them was a bit uncomfortable, and my feet where
usually sore after a full day. I believe this to be a problem of my arch being
pitifully weak before wear these shoes, as the problem receded and vanished
within two weeks. The exterior was quite ascetically pleasing, with a few
suggestive curves of fabric in a simple dark grey, light grey, blue color
scheme. The mesh used as a cover for your foot is very breathable, almost
translucent fabric that somehow manages to hold enough heat in to keep feet
warm for decently long periods of time in the winter, but cool and dry during
the summer. The flat laces that come with the shoe allow for quick and easy
knots that stay tied through extended use. The sole is ridiculously flexible,
allowing me to touch the toe backwards to the heel. The comfort of the shoe
after two weeks is also notable. For the first ten miles, the sole has a very
soft and pliable upper foam. Assuming only one person wears the shoes for this
period of time, the foam with mold itself to the person’s foot, similar to how
a wet sponge will yield to any applied pressure. After the first ten miles, the
foam will harden like a dry sponge to form a rigid structure perfectly molded
to the owners own feet. Dr Scholls be jealous.
As far as lifetime of the shoe, I
have worn this shoe almost exclusively for every day since August of 2009. That’s
around 550 days, give or take. The shoes are still entirely wearable, with no
serious structural defects. There are minor tears on the inside, where the
fabric is pulling the upper foam off of the lower foam, but these are less than
¼ inch long, and pose no immediate threat to the overall shoe. The sole shows
obvious signs of extensive wear, and there is slight discoloration on the
fabric, but that comes from excessive use. I could not be happier with the
shoes overall durability and strength. I have been through blizzards, mud bogs,
sand dunes, grassy fields, the streets of New York City, and everything in
between in them.
One last thing I have to mention is
the cost. These shoes were not cheap, costing me about $140, including $30
shipping & handling. However, they were well worth the cost, as I will foreseeably
get two full years of use out of them without needing a replacement. While a
large initial investment, I fully recommend these shoes to anyone interested in
extreme comfort without slacking in the classy department.
Monday, February 14, 2011
Week Six
Imagine the coldest day in winter.
The wind howling across your face, whipping around your hair, and biting
through every layer you’ve methodically applied to your person. The snow isn’t
falling, but twisting up into the sky in a sort of violent dance. You’re
standing on the side of a street, with no one for company but the wind, snow,
and cold concrete sidewalk. In the distance, you hear the sound of relief that
you’ve been waiting for: The roar of a CATA bus accelerating from a stop, and
the familiar red and white monster lumbers into view. As the brakes screech in
protest, the vehicle slows to a standstill a few feet past you. As you
hurriedly climb inside and feed the machine $1.50, you instantly forget the
last fifteen minutes you’ve spent cursing the cold and the bus. The bus lurches
into motion, temporarily throwing you off balance and into a wall of bodies.
After you steady yourself against an overhead bar, you look around and notice
how packed the bus is. The shear multitude of bodies pushed closer together
than socially acceptable is astounding. “How is the vehicle even moving?” you
wonder. As you begin to settle into the pattern of speeding up and slowing down
for stops, you let your mind wander in an effort to distract from the scene
surround you. Busses aren’t exactly the prettiest things in the world. Built
almost entirely for function, they offer little in the way of beauty. Think of
a big metal box, screw on some wheels and an engine, and throw a few of the
cheapest, smallest plastic chairs inside, and you have a CATA bus. In an effort
to keep the exterior of the bus clean and simple, all advertisements are placed
inside the bus, above the windows. However, this has the end effect of making
the windows smaller, which encloses the occupants even further. The floor is
dirtier than a piece of 100-year-old carpet. The smell is comparable to a wet
dog in sore need of a bath. The air is heavy with the breath of unfamiliar
bodies pressing in on all sides. Even if you are lucky enough to obtain a seat,
if your ride is longer than ten minutes, you will be stiff by the time your
destination is reached. This, unfortunately, has become the norm for commuters
across the State College area.
Quotes:
“I don’t really use
the busses, Dave [a friend] has a car that we all use to get around.” – Sam Heppelmann
(freshmen, physics)
“I routinely pay for
the V and couldn’t care less about giving a company a few dollars if it meant
they could do things right and not wait for full busses to go past.” – Thaddeus
McGilicutty (junior, criminal justice)
“I don’t think I’d
use the links more if they were free… I’d really like to see more buses on the
blue and white loops though, so the wait isn’t as long.” – Laura Wake-Ramos
(freshmen, architecture)
Facts:
A new free CATA app
for Android-based smart phones is available for download. This app shows
real-time bus locations and schedules, just like the app for the iPhone.
“CATA to offer bus tracking app.” Centre Daily Times [Centre County, PA] 2 February 2011: Web.
The University of
Michigan offers free bussing to students, staff, and faculty on university and
city busses through a program called MRide.
University of
Michigan: Parking & Transportation Services. University of Michigan. n.d. Web. 14 February 2011.
CATA offers university employees unlimited CATA access for
$5 a month, and students can purchase a ‘OnePass’ for a variety of time periods
for decreasing monthly costs, ranging from $39 to $55 a month.
CATA. Centre
Area Transit Authority. n.d. Web. 14
February 2011.
CATA is studying “the feasibility of making its entire bus
system fare-free for all riders.”
Smeltz, Adam. “CATA Study to Explore Fare-Free Rider
Access.” statecollege.com. State
College, 17 January 2011. Web. 14 February 2011.
Further research required:
I am interested in investigating several professors who use
the $5 month ride fee, and see their opinion and view on the current study. It
should be interesting to compare the reaction of students to that of
professors.
I am interested in analyzing the multitude of statistics
available on catabus.com on ridership with many different breakdowns and spins
on the data. It will also be interesting to analyze what they don’t provide
statistics on.
Wednesday, February 2, 2011
Week Four
As
an undergraduate student at Penn State, I can certainly see where the school’s
ranking as the #1 Party School came from. As such, I think the report by This
American Life does a very thorough job examining the issue from all points of
view. It was obviously well researched, with audio clips from many different
people affected by it, from students to university officials, from alumni to
local residents. All of these groups were interviewed in a professional, direct
method that got the information necessary without wasting time, which can be a
problem without sounding too leading. Numerous statistics and data analysis
were used to illustrate points in a much more numerical way. The manner in
which the issue is presented is very easy to understand and follow, as the
narrator often inputs their own emotions in such a manner as to not pass judgment,
something which is rather difficult in investigative reporting. The reason for
immediate investigation is twofold: First, the schools ranking as the #1 party
school in the nation, and second, the recent death of freshmen Joe Dado. Specifically,
I believe the narrator in this story wants the listener to understand that at
big party schools like Penn State, alcohol consumption is too much a part of
the social norm and cultural history for anyone to do anything effective about
it.
Personally,
I enjoyed the report. I might not have spared the time on my own to listen to
all of it, but I didn’t have a problem listening to it, just finding the time
to do so. Towards the end I found my mind drifting off, and had to go back and
re-listen to a few portions because I was day dreaming. Other than that, I
found it to be well composed, thoughtful, informative, and clear. I never had a
problem comprehending the subject of conversation, or following the report. I
did find myself in a relatively unique position as an undergraduate student at Penn
State, and possibly that helped me relate to and understand the situation. I
knew the location of all the businesses discussed, and have visited several of
them myself. I have shaken hands with the president of the university, and have
even had a casual lunch with him. I suppose to shorten the work, less time
could have been spent on what the university is doing to curb excessive
drinking. Personally, I know all of the measures they have taken, as they have
all been advertised directly to me. This work supposedly was to discover what
living in State College is like, and they did a fantastic job accomplishing that
in the first three sections. The fourth is kind of a digression into what is
being done to change life in State College, which although ultimately
unnecessary, it is very helpful and relevant to the discussion. I respect the
hell out of This American Life for that report, as it is exceptionally well
done.
Tuesday, February 1, 2011
MFA Reading 1/28/11 aka Night of Many Drinks
The
story of this night begins with my English 15 class, taught by Ms Denise
Grollmus. You see, for extra credit Denise had informed our class we could attend
any one of a series of MFA readings over the course of semester, and write a
500-word summary of the event. This seemed relatively easy to me, so I opted to
attend the first of the readings, which was to take place at the university
club and begin at 7:30 pm on Friday, January 28th, 2011.
I
happen to have class on Fridays until 5:30 pm, and usually go out to dinner
with some friends immediately following class. This particular Friday, we chose
the West Halls dining commons for dinner, known for its exceptional quality in
food preparation. This night the main entrée was crab cakes, and let me tell
you, they were good. We departed the dining commons at approximately 6:15 pm,
and I split off from my friends to head over to the university club. I knew I
would have extra time between dinner and the reading, so I had brought my
laptop with me and planned to edit and revise a narrative I had due on Monday
in the downtime. I had never been to the university club, but I figured it was
just another classroom building, and I would be able to find a chair or desk to
sit and work at.
Boy was I wrong. My first impression
of the building was the stone walkway spilling from a large wooden front door,
flanked on either side by three deep fluted columns with ionic capitals well
above 20 feet in the air. This impressive entrance was made even more grand by
the landscape, which sloped upwards to the structure. As I pushed aside the
door, I was surprised to find a familiar floor plan stretching away from me.
The floors were all wooden, and there weren’t any doors, but rather openings in
the walls. This was definitely not your typical classroom building. To the
right of the front door was what could only be described as a sitting room,
with a multitude of couches and low-seated armchairs scattered throughout on
top of several rugs, interrupted by the occasional coffee table. The room was
probably close to 600 square feet. Behind it was another room arranged in the
same fashion, but only 400 square feet. Both rooms where dark and deserted, and
I felt relieved for some privacy in a situation that was beginning to feel
slightly uncomfortable.
Through
the next hour, no one came in the room or talked to me. People slowly filed
through the front door, but not enough to create a large crowd. They all seemed
familiar with where to go, and didn’t give me a second glance. At approximately
7:25, I packed up my belongings and set off to find the location of the people.
After taking out my iPod, I could hear a repetitive slight thump from a base
speaker, and found a set of stairs leading to a basement where the music was
coming from. These stairs emptied into a space just large enough for a pool
table, which is just where one was located. To the left I saw rows of stackable
chairs all facing a podium and projector screen, which was obviously where the
reading was to take place. No one was sitting in the chairs, but several
jackets had been flung over a few chairs in a very possessive manner. But the
feature that got my attention the most was the red carpet. You see, it not only
covered the floor but also the walls.
There had been wooden frames constructed over top of the cement walls, and the
carpet had been nailed to this, with holes cut into it for recessed lighting.
The other unusual feature was the benches that where cantilevered from the
walls, also covered in red carpet. However unsightly or dirty the benches
where, they looked more roomy and less awkward than the chairs, which were
pushed together to the point of being uncomfortable. Thus, I took a seat near
the back on a bench, and buried my nose in my laptop once more.
After
a few minutes, there was a call to order, including a mention of “road beer.”
As people began to shuffle into the cramped rows of seats, I caught a few
glimpses of what they had been crowded around: A mini bar. After all, it was a
Friday night, was it not? I wondered to myself if there was anyone else in the
basement that was underage. As it turns out, there wasn’t. I imagine I could’ve
gotten a drink if I wanted, but at the time I was genuinely thirsty, and only
interested in water.
The
program started right away with a short introduction of the first of four
writers to be reading their work that evening. Though brief, the introduction
managed to include a slew of sexual innuendos and naughty implications. This
was obviously a group of people who knew each other well enough to laugh at
such jokes. However, the effect on me was to make my desire to leave even more
urgent. All introductions were given in the same manner, and just further
heightened the awkwardness of the evening for me. It didn’t help that I was
about eight years younger than the average age of the room, and the only one
with a laptop taking notes. I was also distressed to notice Nicolette, who
teaches English 15 to a number of my friends, sitting directly across from me.
Despite
my sense of not belonging, I did appreciate a majority of the work read by the
four writers. The first read a very elegantly worded and length fictional
narrative set in the style of letters to the owner of a house from the
neighborhood to which they belonged. The second and third read poems, but they
were very different readers. The second had a very lively personality and
voice, until she started to read her work. Then, for some reason unbeknownst to
me, she became very monotone, and dragged her ‘s’ on for just slightly too
long, which was just enough to distract me from trying to listen to her
writing. I don’t know what she was trying to write about, but I imagine it was
good. The third reader was by far my favorite. She read a series of sonnets,
which covered a variety of topics. The thing I liked most about her was her
style of writing. It was very broken, offering the observer only glimpses of
scenes and emotions, leaving them to fill in the rest with their imagination. I
liked this because it spoke to something different in everyone, provoking a
different interpretation from everyone. It revealed not only something about
the author but something about yourself. Very cool stuff. My expectations were
high for the fourth reader, which is perhaps why her work was such a letdown. She
chose to read a piece comparing panda mating patterns to those of humans,
including personal experiences. Not exactly something I felt particularly drawn
to.
Thankfully
the whole event wrapped up at 9:00 pm on the nose. I was the first person to walk
out of that basement. Yet despite how uncomfortable I was the whole time, I can
see myself returning on February 18th. Partially for the purpose of
hearing good works of writing, partially for extra credit, and partially for
the humor of being the only undergrad student at an event geared toward a very
exclusive audience without enough of a backbone to kick me out.
Sunday, January 23, 2011
Week Three
So
here is what I generally think about this: It is boring. There. That is my
response to "Shitty First Drafts" by Anne Lamott. I mean, really? Everyone with
a competent third grade education knows the writing process. It starts with
brainstorming, continued with drafting, followed by several stages of revising
and editing, and ends with a final polished draft. I really do not see why this
has to be the subject of debate. Who in the world thinks that great writers just
sit down, writing something, and publish it as is? I have never met anyone with
such a skewed perception of the world. Now I know that there are people out
there who have not experienced the benefits of free public education, and while
it is up to debate about whether or not that is their fault or not, we can
agree that there are uneducated, illiterate people living in our towns and
communities. Nevertheless, are these the kind of people who enrolling at Penn
State and taking English 15? Or better, are these the kind of people that are
going to be reading novels and works of non-fiction?
However, this piece does bring up an
interesting method of writing. In the excerpt, she describes the process she
goes through to write food reviews. It starts by her gathering observations and
quotes from a group of friends about a large variety of food. Then she runs
into a roadblock: she does not know where to start the first paragraph. After
much procrastination, she just writes everything she can and slowly whittles it
down. While this is possible, I am finding difficulty subscribing to the belief
that it is the most efficient method to writing, at least for me. My simple,
user-friendly alternative is a common enough solution: the outline. Now this
may just be a result of my writing history containing mainly persuasive and
informative pieces, but I also use outlines for a variety of purposes,
including shopping lists and class notes. They are quick, easily adaptable,
concise, and are personalizable for your specific needs quickly and easily.
They also offer you a first glimpse at your finished product. With an outline,
you can get a point across while using half the paper and a quarter of the
words as an actual paper. It might not be the most graceful or eloquent, but
that is not the point of an outline. A draft of a paper is easy to flesh out
from the frame of an outline. Outlines form the content of a paper, and are
editable until the flow of ideas and logic is clear and easy to follow. Then
the rest of the work can be filled in with sentences and paragraphs, and run
through another process of editing for clarity. Then voila! A finished work is in
hand, and one is free to take on other tasks.
The point Anne Lamott is suggesting
in “Shitty First Draft” is combining the traditional brainstorming and drafting
phases. Rather than have a period where one searches for inspiration, and then
takes time to pick the best of the inspired ideas and apply them to the work,
she is suggesting using the work as a source and method of inspiration. While I
understand where she is coming from, I have my doubts. Personally, I do not foresee
this ever producing great work for me. In others, I see if merely encouraging
settling for the first idea one comes across, and attempting to write a
significant and legitimate work of literature from that first mediocre idea. Whereas
a period of brainstorming encourages other ideas to form and blossom, writing
straight from the gun can turn into a mess without a meaning quite easily. Or worse
yet, the point can be arbitrary, insignificant, or just plain unoriginal, in
which case the paper is cursed before it can ever be written.
In hindsight, I am not sure if I
answered any questions, or just created new ones. I attempted to follow Ms.
Lamott’s suggestion and just write whatever comes to mind when it does. I am
still unsure if this entry is even clear enough to follow. However, I am not
nervous about publishing this, as it is merely a blog, and the purpose of the
blog is to consistently write on topic relevant to current class material. Therefore,
whether or not this essay makes any sense is irrelevant to the fact that I
wrote it, and attempted a new writing style while writing it. I feel I
fulfilled the requirements in my own method, and if it is not accepted, I will
know not to attempt this style again.
Monday, January 17, 2011
Week Two
The
struggles of parenthood can often be overwhelming. They are nothing compared to
the struggles of a parent whose child has become an addict. The essay “My Addicted Son” by David Sheff covers this situation. The author focuses on
specific events in his life that directly relate to his sons fall into the
clutches of drug abuse, rather than trying to narrate his entire life story.
This story is especially relevant to our age group, as we are entering college
and living on our own for the first time in our lives. While this independence
is usually very welcome, it can also lead to the undoing of many college students,
even those considered to be the “good students” in high school.
The author includes adequate
descriptions of major events in the narrative that help the reader visualize
them and feel the emotions pulsating through the story. From the crying of the
authors son Jasper after Nick was arrested to the utter helplessness when Nick
relapsed the third time, one really gets a feel for the desolation and loss
this story reveals. The intended audience is all parents, whether their
children are drug-free or going through the same trials as Nick went through. It
serves as not only a warning to all parents, but also as a testament to what
one might have to go through should their child fall victim to drugs. Although
dialogue is rare, what David does include highlights Nick’s detachment from his
family and society.
David has done an excellent job
providing context for each of the major events, and flowing the story smoothly
from one to the next. The only time I had trouble following was on page 6, when
he reminisced on times he and Nick had had at the Steps of Rome café, and how
he had slowly made more and more excuses for Nick’s behavior through the years.
This whole process of fighting meth for control of Nick has showed David how
much pain and loss parents can bear for their children. As he says at the
bottom of page 6, “Every time we reach a point where we feel as if we can’t
bear any more, we do.” The bonds between parent and child are some of the
strongest in the world, able to forgive the gravest travesties. I have only
known one side of this relationship, but I can see it at work when I Skype my
parents. As a parent, David is torn apart by watching his sons slip into
addiction. As a writer, he does a fantastic job characterizing and documenting
every major event without letting his own emotions cloud the story, only spice
up the tale whenever appropriate.
Monday, January 10, 2011
Week One
There are a few things that are
always with one during the walk of life. Unfortunately, the things that stick
with you seem to always be those that you despise the most. For me, one of
these things is writing. I've never been a very good writer, and continue to
struggle to this day. Writing just takes too long. Often I feel I could easily
express my opinions and arguments in a much more concise and
practical manner than that which is expected of me. My problem first
materialized in fifth grade, when I got a C in English. It was my first C ever,
and came completely out of the blue. I thought I was doing just fine. As a
child, I was devastated, and gradually grew a discomfort for English,
which grew into an annoyance, which grew into a dislike, which grew into a
hatred, which grew into abhorrence. I'd really rather do just about anything
than write. Unfortunately,
as we are all painfully aware, it is not possible to exist in today's society
without writing. English exists as a core curricular subject in every level of
education. Scholarships and applications for school and work often require
essays that are the deciding factor. So one learns to live with such things and
get one with life.
My situation as a rhetor is
slightly different. I have adequate competence in observing and understanding exigencies,
but my motivation and determination to see my message through to the end is
lacking, to say the least. A prime example would be current events. In all
honesty, I really should at least follow the state and national government, as
the policies my representatives write and put into effect are those that affect
my day-to-day life. But instead, I find myself asking my friends, peers,
parents, and instructors whether or not things have already changed, only to be
met with the same blank stares that occupies my face. Everyone knows that the
local news stations are not the best source of relevant information, but it’s
better than nothing. I have, in effect, become another one of the blind mass of
the American public, uninformed and apathetic to global happenings.
Despite my lack of appreciation
for writing, I find ample satisfaction of reading the work of others, provided
it is thought through and well written. Some of the most inspiring works to me
is Do Hard Things by Alex and Brett Harris. This book contains a description
of their nonviolent, teen-led revolution against the low expectations society
places upon adolescents. It is written in a very up-in-your-face manner,
demanding one put down the book and do something for oneself, a friend, or a
stranger. Another very influential book for me has been Diary by Chuck
Palahniuk. In this novel, the theme of suffering and true inspiration and their
intimate relation are discussed and theorized. Seeing as how architecture is
technically an art, I consider any discussion on inspiration to be intriguing.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
